https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=4690 A practitioner advised that the daughter of a spouse's sister does not qualify as a relative under the Explanation to section 56(2)(v) for gift-tax purposes; the enquirer disputed this, invoking Hindu kinship terminology (mausa) and a secondary commentary suggesting such familial relations may be covered, resulting in an unresolved difference of interpretation. en-us Sat, 08 Sep 2012 23:14:24 +0530 Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:57:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=4690 A practitioner advised that the daughter of a spouse's sister does not qualify as a relative under the Explanation to section 56(2)(v) for gift-tax purposes; the enquirer disputed this, invoking Hindu kinship terminology (mausa) and a secondary commentary suggesting such familial relations may be covered, resulting in an unresolved difference of interpretation. Discussion-Forum Income Tax Sat, 08 Sep 2012 23:14:24 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=4690