<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Taxi Service</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=4674</link>
    <description>Issue: taxi service invoice dated 31.07.2012 for service on 05.08.2012, charged service tax after a 60% abatement; provider reports depositing tax. Advisory: proprietorships not availing input credit generally should not charge service tax; service tax liability rests with the service recipient, so the recipient must pay tax irrespective of provider deposit, with invoice and accounting dates not affecting that obligation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 14:50:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:57:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=318991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Taxi Service</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=4674</link>
      <description>Issue: taxi service invoice dated 31.07.2012 for service on 05.08.2012, charged service tax after a 60% abatement; provider reports depositing tax. Advisory: proprietorships not availing input credit generally should not charge service tax; service tax liability rests with the service recipient, so the recipient must pay tax irrespective of provider deposit, with invoice and accounting dates not affecting that obligation.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 14:50:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=4674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>