<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Service Tax on reverse charge method - reg.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=4653</link>
    <description>The query asks whether the service recipient must pay a portion of service tax under the Reverse Charge Mechanism for manpower recruitment services. One advisory view says if the provider is a private limited or limited company the provider will charge full service tax to the recipient; otherwise liability is split 50% each. An alternative advisory view contends the recipient must pay 75% under reverse charge, and a participant agreed with that position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:08:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:57:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=318971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Service Tax on reverse charge method - reg.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=4653</link>
      <description>The query asks whether the service recipient must pay a portion of service tax under the Reverse Charge Mechanism for manpower recruitment services. One advisory view says if the provider is a private limited or limited company the provider will charge full service tax to the recipient; otherwise liability is split 50% each. An alternative advisory view contends the recipient must pay 75% under reverse charge, and a participant agreed with that position.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:08:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=4653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>