<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SEZ Procedure</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=3820</link>
    <description>Whether second hand capital goods may be transferred into an SEZ under an 80:20 new:used allocation, and what procedural, documentary and accounting steps and tax exemption consequences follow, is the primary issue. The forum replies state that one commentator sees no basis for the 80:20 formula in the SEZ Act and Rules, while another contends a procedure exists but must be carefully examined and verified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:24:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=318154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SEZ Procedure</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=3820</link>
      <description>Whether second hand capital goods may be transferred into an SEZ under an 80:20 new:used allocation, and what procedural, documentary and accounting steps and tax exemption consequences follow, is the primary issue. The forum replies state that one commentator sees no basis for the 80:20 formula in the SEZ Act and Rules, while another contends a procedure exists but must be carefully examined and verified.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:24:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=3820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>