<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>MODVAT Credit of service tax paid under the premium of Key_man Policy</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=3247</link>
    <description>The issue is whether CENVAT credit of service tax on a keyman insurance premium qualifies as an input service under the pre amendment Rule 2(l). One view argues that the &quot;includes&quot; limb and the illustrative list of &quot;activities relating to business&quot; admit keyman insurance as business related protection, supported by circulars and tribunal decisions allowing credit for company provided employee services. The opposing view invokes the principle that services for human consumption are not input services and notes a post 2011 amendment that narrows eligibility, creating a material risk to such credit claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:14:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=317600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>MODVAT Credit of service tax paid under the premium of Key_man Policy</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=3247</link>
      <description>The issue is whether CENVAT credit of service tax on a keyman insurance premium qualifies as an input service under the pre amendment Rule 2(l). One view argues that the &quot;includes&quot; limb and the illustrative list of &quot;activities relating to business&quot; admit keyman insurance as business related protection, supported by circulars and tribunal decisions allowing credit for company provided employee services. The opposing view invokes the principle that services for human consumption are not input services and notes a post 2011 amendment that narrows eligibility, creating a material risk to such credit claims.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:14:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=3247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>