<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Export Obligation</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2963</link>
    <description>A 100% EOU received rupee payment from ECGC for an unpaid export; AD Category I banks may write off export bills where insurers confirm settlement, and such write offs are not limited by earlier percentage caps. Surrender of incentives follows the Foreign Trade Policy. Importantly, claims settled in rupees by ECGC or IRDA regulated insurers are not to be construed as export realisation in foreign exchange, raising doubt about counting such receipts against export obligation for EOUs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:53:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=317320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Export Obligation</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2963</link>
      <description>A 100% EOU received rupee payment from ECGC for an unpaid export; AD Category I banks may write off export bills where insurers confirm settlement, and such write offs are not limited by earlier percentage caps. Surrender of incentives follows the Foreign Trade Policy. Importantly, claims settled in rupees by ECGC or IRDA regulated insurers are not to be construed as export realisation in foreign exchange, raising doubt about counting such receipts against export obligation for EOUs.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:53:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>