<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CLEARANCE AGAINST CT-3 (EOU UNIT)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2927</link>
    <description>If the range officer of the EOU notifies that the bond bearing the CT-3 bond number has been renewed, the CT-3 need not be amended to show the renewed validity date; the range communication confirming renewal serves as the practical confirmation for clearance, subject to obtaining divisional confirmation if required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:06:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=317284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CLEARANCE AGAINST CT-3 (EOU UNIT)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2927</link>
      <description>If the range officer of the EOU notifies that the bond bearing the CT-3 bond number has been renewed, the CT-3 need not be amended to show the renewed validity date; the range communication confirming renewal serves as the practical confirmation for clearance, subject to obtaining divisional confirmation if required.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:06:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>