<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Proof of export with out BRC</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2767</link>
    <description>Acceptance of proof of export is subject to the bond issuing authority&#039;s satisfaction; if not satisfied with ARE 1, Shipping Bill and mate&#039;s receipt, the authority may require a Bank Realisation Certificate. Where payment terms delay receipt of the BRC, the exporter may present alternative documents such as the SDF/GR form and explain the payment terms to justify the absence of an early BRC, but must supply the BRC when it becomes available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:47:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=317129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Proof of export with out BRC</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2767</link>
      <description>Acceptance of proof of export is subject to the bond issuing authority&#039;s satisfaction; if not satisfied with ARE 1, Shipping Bill and mate&#039;s receipt, the authority may require a Bank Realisation Certificate. Where payment terms delay receipt of the BRC, the exporter may present alternative documents such as the SDF/GR form and explain the payment terms to justify the absence of an early BRC, but must supply the BRC when it becomes available.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:47:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>