<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Material removed w/o duty payment</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2646</link>
    <description>Removal of excisable capital goods after use requires duty payment on clearance even if Cenvat credit was never availed; Rule 3(5) applies only where Cenvat credit has been taken and so cannot be used to justify duty-free removal. Options are to avail credit and follow the reversal mechanism on removal or declare the asset as scrap and pay duty on the transaction value; merely stating that credit was not availed does not relieve the duty obligation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:01:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=317012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Material removed w/o duty payment</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2646</link>
      <description>Removal of excisable capital goods after use requires duty payment on clearance even if Cenvat credit was never availed; Rule 3(5) applies only where Cenvat credit has been taken and so cannot be used to justify duty-free removal. Options are to avail credit and follow the reversal mechanism on removal or declare the asset as scrap and pay duty on the transaction value; merely stating that credit was not availed does not relieve the duty obligation.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:01:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>