<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CST clarification</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2470</link>
    <description>Whether a seller may reverse excess interstate tax when a buyer later furnishes a C Form is debated: one view requires the invoice to state &quot;C Form due&quot; at sale and disfavors write backs if that procedural step was omitted; the contrasting view permits issuing a credit note or refund after later production of the form, treating goods return time limits as inapplicable and allowing concession claims during assessment or appeal, with any excess tax refundable to the buyer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 14:45:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=316836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CST clarification</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2470</link>
      <description>Whether a seller may reverse excess interstate tax when a buyer later furnishes a C Form is debated: one view requires the invoice to state &quot;C Form due&quot; at sale and disfavors write backs if that procedural step was omitted; the contrasting view permits issuing a credit note or refund after later production of the form, treating goods return time limits as inapplicable and allowing concession claims during assessment or appeal, with any excess tax refundable to the buyer.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 14:45:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>