<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>STAY APPLICATION - CESTAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2376</link>
    <description>Appellant default resulted in dismissal despite prior deposit and submission of a compliance challan; the procedural rule permits the Tribunal, if satisfied that there was sufficient cause for non appearance, to set aside the dismissal and restore the appeal, and the suggested remedy is filing a miscellaneous application for restoration with evidence of compliance and sufficient cause.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:16:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=316742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>STAY APPLICATION - CESTAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2376</link>
      <description>Appellant default resulted in dismissal despite prior deposit and submission of a compliance challan; the procedural rule permits the Tribunal, if satisfied that there was sufficient cause for non appearance, to set aside the dismissal and restore the appeal, and the suggested remedy is filing a miscellaneous application for restoration with evidence of compliance and sufficient cause.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:16:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>