<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>How to treat and resale duty paid goods returned</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2373</link>
    <description>The issue concerns resale of goods sold with excise duty that were returned by an unregistered contractor who cannot issue an excise invoice; the manufacturer is not claiming CENVAT on returns and asks whether the goods can be resold without charging excise and what procedure (one suggested option being a delivery challan) and records are required, while an initial reply indicated incomplete facts and that claiming CENVAT on such returns appears difficult.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 10:38:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=316739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>How to treat and resale duty paid goods returned</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2373</link>
      <description>The issue concerns resale of goods sold with excise duty that were returned by an unregistered contractor who cannot issue an excise invoice; the manufacturer is not claiming CENVAT on returns and asks whether the goods can be resold without charging excise and what procedure (one suggested option being a delivery challan) and records are required, while an initial reply indicated incomplete facts and that claiming CENVAT on such returns appears difficult.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 10:38:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>