<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Proof of export</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2216</link>
    <description>Rule 12 of the SEZ Rules, 2006 mandates that a Bill of Export is required where supplies from DTA to SEZ claim export benefits; the Bill must be submitted by the supplier. If export documents (shipping bill, export invoice, LC) are in the name of the contracting exporter while goods were dispatched under the supplier&#039;s LUT and ARE 1, authorities may treat the transaction as a merchant export and raise compliance concerns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:33:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=316585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Proof of export</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2216</link>
      <description>Rule 12 of the SEZ Rules, 2006 mandates that a Bill of Export is required where supplies from DTA to SEZ claim export benefits; the Bill must be submitted by the supplier. If export documents (shipping bill, export invoice, LC) are in the name of the contracting exporter while goods were dispatched under the supplier&#039;s LUT and ARE 1, authorities may treat the transaction as a merchant export and raise compliance concerns.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:33:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>