<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Valuation of car - owned by employer - owned by employee</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1718</link>
    <description>The operative legal point cited identifies that sums paid by the employer in respect of obligations which, but for such payment, would have been payable by the assessee, fall within the scope of employer-provided benefits and trigger taxable perquisite treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:50:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=316162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Valuation of car - owned by employer - owned by employee</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1718</link>
      <description>The operative legal point cited identifies that sums paid by the employer in respect of obligations which, but for such payment, would have been payable by the assessee, fall within the scope of employer-provided benefits and trigger taxable perquisite treatment.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:50:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>