<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Eligibililty for exemption as per notification 30/2004</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1602</link>
    <description>Manufacturer of nylon monofilament does not take CENVAT on inputs and claims an input exemption under the relevant notification. The key issue is whether fishnet manufacturers, classified under the fishnet tariff and currently not remitting excise (reportedly claiming SSI exemption), are eligible for the same exemption, and how their claimed SSI or other treatment affects duty liability and the supplier&#039;s position under the input exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:34:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=316053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Eligibililty for exemption as per notification 30/2004</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1602</link>
      <description>Manufacturer of nylon monofilament does not take CENVAT on inputs and claims an input exemption under the relevant notification. The key issue is whether fishnet manufacturers, classified under the fishnet tariff and currently not remitting excise (reportedly claiming SSI exemption), are eligible for the same exemption, and how their claimed SSI or other treatment affects duty liability and the supplier&#039;s position under the input exemption.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:34:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>