<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>RTI - reply</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1533</link>
    <description>The adviser counsels that an assessee served with a show cause notice may either seek an extension to file a reply while awaiting information under the Right to Information Act, or file the reply without delay if existing records already demonstrate the position. The note stresses that documentary gaps or withheld internal communications can prejudice the defence, and highlights that establishing the transaction as bona fide job work rather than labour supply is the decisive factual point.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:15:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=315987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>RTI - reply</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1533</link>
      <description>The adviser counsels that an assessee served with a show cause notice may either seek an extension to file a reply while awaiting information under the Right to Information Act, or file the reply without delay if existing records already demonstrate the position. The note stresses that documentary gaps or withheld internal communications can prejudice the defence, and highlights that establishing the transaction as bona fide job work rather than labour supply is the decisive factual point.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:15:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>