<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Formal refund claim for refund pursuant to CESTAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1484</link>
    <description>CESTAT authority indicates the one-year limitation for refund runs from the date of the appellate order. Where jurisdiction between customs and excise was unclear, an earlier refund application filed with customs should be weighed to avoid prejudicing the claimant, and the tribunal-quantified refund remains subject to unjust enrichment scrutiny.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:16:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=315941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Formal refund claim for refund pursuant to CESTAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1484</link>
      <description>CESTAT authority indicates the one-year limitation for refund runs from the date of the appellate order. Where jurisdiction between customs and excise was unclear, an earlier refund application filed with customs should be weighed to avoid prejudicing the claimant, and the tribunal-quantified refund remains subject to unjust enrichment scrutiny.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:16:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>