<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cenvat credit rule</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1138</link>
    <description>The apportionment formula in Rule 6 for Cenvat credit is complex when applied to taxpayers performing both manufacturing and service activities simultaneously, because it must allocate input credit between those mixed activities; however, the formula becomes materially simpler and easier to apply where the taxpayer undertakes only a single activity, either manufacturing or service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 13:36:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=315611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cenvat credit rule</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1138</link>
      <description>The apportionment formula in Rule 6 for Cenvat credit is complex when applied to taxpayers performing both manufacturing and service activities simultaneously, because it must allocate input credit between those mixed activities; however, the formula becomes materially simpler and easier to apply where the taxpayer undertakes only a single activity, either manufacturing or service.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 13:36:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>