<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Litigation - two different stands</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1137</link>
    <description>Taxpayers may deposit interest on minor audit points while contesting other significant points; the department cannot treat the taxpayer&#039;s mixed procedural choices as determinative. Each legal issue must be decided on its merits, and paying small liabilities for pragmatic reasons does not bar contesting separate legal grounds arising from the same audit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 12:45:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=315610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Litigation - two different stands</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1137</link>
      <description>Taxpayers may deposit interest on minor audit points while contesting other significant points; the department cannot treat the taxpayer&#039;s mixed procedural choices as determinative. Each legal issue must be decided on its merits, and paying small liabilities for pragmatic reasons does not bar contesting separate legal grounds arising from the same audit.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 12:45:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>