<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Payment of Duty - manufacturer</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1102</link>
    <description>Where a manufacturer fails to maintain separate accounts for cenvat credit and clears goods exempted by notification, the discussion concludes that because such exemptions are optional the manufacturer may elect to pay the applicable excise duty on clearance of those goods rather than apply the cenvat credit reversal provision that prescribes a deemed payment based on the value of exempted goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:50:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=315575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Payment of Duty - manufacturer</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1102</link>
      <description>Where a manufacturer fails to maintain separate accounts for cenvat credit and clears goods exempted by notification, the discussion concludes that because such exemptions are optional the manufacturer may elect to pay the applicable excise duty on clearance of those goods rather than apply the cenvat credit reversal provision that prescribes a deemed payment based on the value of exempted goods.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:50:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>