<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Clarification - conveyance expenses</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1073</link>
    <description>Whether employer reimbursements for fuel for employee-owned motorbikes fall under conveyance for Fringe Benefit Tax is arguable because the term is undefined; one view accepts such reimbursements as local conveyance for official purposes, but the position may be open to challenge by tax authorities and requires justification of the nexus to official conveyance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:53:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=315548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Clarification - conveyance expenses</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1073</link>
      <description>Whether employer reimbursements for fuel for employee-owned motorbikes fall under conveyance for Fringe Benefit Tax is arguable because the term is undefined; one view accepts such reimbursements as local conveyance for official purposes, but the position may be open to challenge by tax authorities and requires justification of the nexus to official conveyance.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:53:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>