<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Conveyance allowance and car facility</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1007</link>
    <description>Whether an employee may claim a conveyance allowance exemption alongside a nil perquisite valuation for employer provided car use for commuting is addressed. The reply indicates no prohibition on claiming both concurrently, but notes that removal of fringe benefit tax and reintroduction of taxation on perquisites limits the effectiveness of such tax planning because employer paid vehicle expenses and perquisite valuation rules alter the tax treatment of the car facility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:54:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=315483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Conveyance allowance and car facility</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1007</link>
      <description>Whether an employee may claim a conveyance allowance exemption alongside a nil perquisite valuation for employer provided car use for commuting is addressed. The reply indicates no prohibition on claiming both concurrently, but notes that removal of fringe benefit tax and reintroduction of taxation on perquisites limits the effectiveness of such tax planning because employer paid vehicle expenses and perquisite valuation rules alter the tax treatment of the car facility.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:54:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=1007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>