<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Liability of service tax and interest</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=877</link>
    <description>A contractor who paid outstanding service tax and interest before a show cause notice remains exposed to penalty if elements of deliberate tax evasion are present; Section 78 permits penalty despite pre-notice payment when intent to evade is shown. Penalties under Section 76 and Section 78 are mutually exclusive, so concurrent penalties merit scrutiny, and the adjudicating authority may remit penalties on proof of reasonable cause.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:28:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=315362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Liability of service tax and interest</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=877</link>
      <description>A contractor who paid outstanding service tax and interest before a show cause notice remains exposed to penalty if elements of deliberate tax evasion are present; Section 78 permits penalty despite pre-notice payment when intent to evade is shown. Penalties under Section 76 and Section 78 are mutually exclusive, so concurrent penalties merit scrutiny, and the adjudicating authority may remit penalties on proof of reasonable cause.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:28:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>