<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Liability of service tax - real estate developer</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=835</link>
    <description>Whether service tax attaches to real estate developers under the works contract or other service heads is questioned with reference to Raheja and Magus Construction. The advisory opinion in the document states that, subject to final apex court determination, real estate developers should not be liable to service tax, noting that despite the Raheja precedent there exist substantial grounds supporting non-liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:04:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=315320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Liability of service tax - real estate developer</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=835</link>
      <description>Whether service tax attaches to real estate developers under the works contract or other service heads is questioned with reference to Raheja and Magus Construction. The advisory opinion in the document states that, subject to final apex court determination, real estate developers should not be liable to service tax, noting that despite the Raheja precedent there exist substantial grounds supporting non-liability.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:04:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>