<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Availment of Cenvat credit</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=824</link>
    <description>The issue is whether a manufacturer receiving inputs from a 100% EOU may claim Cenvat credit of duties and cesses paid by the EOU and whether the multiplicative formula in Rule 3(7) governs that credit; one forum position applies the formula generally while another treats the formula as relevant to basic excise duty only and allows full credit of education cess and SHE cess, a view supported by tribunal decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:34:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=315310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Availment of Cenvat credit</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=824</link>
      <description>The issue is whether a manufacturer receiving inputs from a 100% EOU may claim Cenvat credit of duties and cesses paid by the EOU and whether the multiplicative formula in Rule 3(7) governs that credit; one forum position applies the formula generally while another treats the formula as relevant to basic excise duty only and allows full credit of education cess and SHE cess, a view supported by tribunal decisions.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:34:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>