<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Proportionate duty on freight and insurance</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=726</link>
    <description>For excise law the place of removal is the factory gate while export procedure may treat the port as removal. The department sought to treat freight and insurance as post factory expenses and adjust proportionate duty when granting rebate. If excise duty was paid on a value inclusive of freight and insurance, denial of rebate on that ground is not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:16:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=315223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Proportionate duty on freight and insurance</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=726</link>
      <description>For excise law the place of removal is the factory gate while export procedure may treat the port as removal. The department sought to treat freight and insurance as post factory expenses and adjust proportionate duty when granting rebate. If excise duty was paid on a value inclusive of freight and insurance, denial of rebate on that ground is not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:16:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>