<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Demand of service tax already deposited</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=344</link>
    <description>A security-services provider faced a demand for service tax after the PSU client deducted and deposited the tax and issued a deposit certificate. Generally, a recipient&#039;s unilateral payment does not replace the provider&#039;s statutory obligation, but if the recipient deposited tax on the prescribed TR-6 challan while quoting the provider&#039;s particulars, the provider may obtain relief or credit against the duplicate demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:33:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=314864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Demand of service tax already deposited</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=344</link>
      <description>A security-services provider faced a demand for service tax after the PSU client deducted and deposited the tax and issued a deposit certificate. Generally, a recipient&#039;s unilateral payment does not replace the provider&#039;s statutory obligation, but if the recipient deposited tax on the prescribed TR-6 challan while quoting the provider&#039;s particulars, the provider may obtain relief or credit against the duplicate demand.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:33:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>