<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Category - &quot;telephone cable&quot; and applicability of service tax</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=242</link>
    <description>Service tax applicability to roadside telephone cable laying-excavation, cable placement and back filling-is contested: one view classifies the work as Erection, Commissioning and Installation services subject to service tax with subcontractors liable, while another relies on a departmental circular and case law to argue that cable laying is not taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:29:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=314769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Category - &quot;telephone cable&quot; and applicability of service tax</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=242</link>
      <description>Service tax applicability to roadside telephone cable laying-excavation, cable placement and back filling-is contested: one view classifies the work as Erection, Commissioning and Installation services subject to service tax with subcontractors liable, while another relies on a departmental circular and case law to argue that cable laying is not taxable.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:29:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>