<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant&#039;s single appeal deemed valid as original authority sent one order instead of four separate ones.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15091</link>
    <description>The original authority had dispatched only one order in original and not the four orders in original to the appellants - one appeal filed by the appellant before Commissioner (Appeals) is maintainable and there was no need for the appellant to file four separate appeals against one order in original - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:49:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:49:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=308676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant&#039;s single appeal deemed valid as original authority sent one order instead of four separate ones.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15091</link>
      <description>The original authority had dispatched only one order in original and not the four orders in original to the appellants - one appeal filed by the appellant before Commissioner (Appeals) is maintainable and there was no need for the appellant to file four separate appeals against one order in original - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:49:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>