<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 465 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238010</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, confirming the cancellation of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for both assessment years 2005-2006 and 2006-2007. The decision was based on the lack of substantial evidence proving the assessee retained cash as income, granting the benefit of doubt due to the absence of concrete proof. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the overall context of the assessee&#039;s actions in overturning the penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=308631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 465 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238010</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, confirming the cancellation of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for both assessment years 2005-2006 and 2006-2007. The decision was based on the lack of substantial evidence proving the assessee retained cash as income, granting the benefit of doubt due to the absence of concrete proof. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the overall context of the assessee&#039;s actions in overturning the penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>