<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 457 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238002</link>
    <description>The judgment upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order rejecting the request for conversion, citing the lack of necessary declarations in the shipping bill and ARE-2 form, improper examination by an inspector, and absence of relevant documentary evidence at the time of export. The appeal was dismissed, maintaining that the request for conversion could not be considered under the circumstances presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 12:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=308623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 457 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238002</link>
      <description>The judgment upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order rejecting the request for conversion, citing the lack of necessary declarations in the shipping bill and ARE-2 form, improper examination by an inspector, and absence of relevant documentary evidence at the time of export. The appeal was dismissed, maintaining that the request for conversion could not be considered under the circumstances presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>