<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 450 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237995</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the manufacturers in two separate appeals regarding duty demands on scooters and motorcycles. It held that dealers&#039; advertisement expenses should not be included in the assessable value of goods cleared by the manufacturers, as the manufacturers did not have an enforceable legal right to insist on dealers incurring such expenses. The Tribunal found that the manufacturers&#039; agreements with dealers focused on promoting sales but did not mandate specific advertisement expenses, leading to the orders confirming duty demands and penalties being set aside in favor of the manufacturers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=308616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 450 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237995</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the manufacturers in two separate appeals regarding duty demands on scooters and motorcycles. It held that dealers&#039; advertisement expenses should not be included in the assessable value of goods cleared by the manufacturers, as the manufacturers did not have an enforceable legal right to insist on dealers incurring such expenses. The Tribunal found that the manufacturers&#039; agreements with dealers focused on promoting sales but did not mandate specific advertisement expenses, leading to the orders confirming duty demands and penalties being set aside in favor of the manufacturers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>