<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 448 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237993</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) lacked jurisdiction to entertain an appeal concerning recovery proceedings under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s limited jurisdiction in such matters. The decision highlights the significance of adhering to legal principles and precedents when determining the validity of appellate decisions under specific statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 06:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=308614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 448 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237993</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) lacked jurisdiction to entertain an appeal concerning recovery proceedings under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s limited jurisdiction in such matters. The decision highlights the significance of adhering to legal principles and precedents when determining the validity of appellate decisions under specific statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>