<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 442 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237987</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was discussed in the context of imported e-bike parts sent for job work and converted into finished e-bikes cleared on payment of duty. The analysis states that, at the prima facie stage, duty-paid input goods and proper bill of entry particulars supported entitlement to credit, and alleged defects in customs exemption compliance did not defeat the manufacturer&#039;s claim. It also notes that the demand appeared prima facie time-barred because the Revenue had earlier knowledge of the credit position and the extended limitation period was considered unsustainable, supporting unconditional stay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=308608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 442 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237987</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was discussed in the context of imported e-bike parts sent for job work and converted into finished e-bikes cleared on payment of duty. The analysis states that, at the prima facie stage, duty-paid input goods and proper bill of entry particulars supported entitlement to credit, and alleged defects in customs exemption compliance did not defeat the manufacturer&#039;s claim. It also notes that the demand appeared prima facie time-barred because the Revenue had earlier knowledge of the credit position and the extended limitation period was considered unsustainable, supporting unconditional stay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>