<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 441 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237986</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the confirmation of demand of duty, interest, and penalty under Rule 25, directing payment of interest under Rule 27 and reducing the penalty to Rs. 5,000 based on a Gujarat High Court decision. The appellant&#039;s duty liability for short payment was addressed, with subsequent clearances made using Cenvat credit. The Tribunal instructed quantification of interest payable and upheld the penalty reduction, disposing of the appeal accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 06:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=308607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 441 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237986</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the confirmation of demand of duty, interest, and penalty under Rule 25, directing payment of interest under Rule 27 and reducing the penalty to Rs. 5,000 based on a Gujarat High Court decision. The appellant&#039;s duty liability for short payment was addressed, with subsequent clearances made using Cenvat credit. The Tribunal instructed quantification of interest payable and upheld the penalty reduction, disposing of the appeal accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>