<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (12) TMI 300 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157934</link>
    <description>Supplies of food, drinks and refreshments by an incorporated members&#039; club to permanent members were held outside the sales tax net because mutuality and identity between the club and those members continued to exist; the relationship was treated as one of agency and recoupment, so no taxable sale arose and the club was not a dealer for those transactions. Supplies to temporary members were held taxable because their limited and restricted status did not create the reciprocal identity needed for mutuality; those transactions therefore fell within the sales tax provisions and made the club a dealer in respect of them. The club&#039;s liability was confined to dealings with temporary members.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:51:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=308604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (12) TMI 300 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157934</link>
      <description>Supplies of food, drinks and refreshments by an incorporated members&#039; club to permanent members were held outside the sales tax net because mutuality and identity between the club and those members continued to exist; the relationship was treated as one of agency and recoupment, so no taxable sale arose and the club was not a dealer for those transactions. Supplies to temporary members were held taxable because their limited and restricted status did not create the reciprocal identity needed for mutuality; those transactions therefore fell within the sales tax provisions and made the club a dealer in respect of them. The club&#039;s liability was confined to dealings with temporary members.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>