<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 630 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157933</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent injunction against the defendants for trademark infringement of &#039;TIME&#039; and &#039;TIME ASIA.&#039; The court awarded damages for reputation loss and punitive damages to deter future violations, emphasizing the protection of intellectual property rights. The plaintiff was also entitled to costs and interest, reinforcing the court&#039;s stance on upholding trademark rights and fair competition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=308603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 630 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157933</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent injunction against the defendants for trademark infringement of &#039;TIME&#039; and &#039;TIME ASIA.&#039; The court awarded damages for reputation loss and punitive damages to deter future violations, emphasizing the protection of intellectual property rights. The plaintiff was also entitled to costs and interest, reinforcing the court&#039;s stance on upholding trademark rights and fair competition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>