<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (9) TMI 318 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157931</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court addressed the delay in filing a special appeal against the High Court&#039;s judgment, deciding the case on its merits due to administrative exigencies. Regarding the respondent&#039;s appointment on compassionate grounds, the court held that accepting a Lower Division Clerk position consummated the right for further consideration. The proviso to Rule 5 of the Rajasthan Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Rules, 1975 did not apply as the respondent had already accepted the LDC appointment. The court distinguished a previous judgment and dismissed the respondent&#039;s writ petition, allowing the civil appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=308601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (9) TMI 318 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157931</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court addressed the delay in filing a special appeal against the High Court&#039;s judgment, deciding the case on its merits due to administrative exigencies. Regarding the respondent&#039;s appointment on compassionate grounds, the court held that accepting a Lower Division Clerk position consummated the right for further consideration. The proviso to Rule 5 of the Rajasthan Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Rules, 1975 did not apply as the respondent had already accepted the LDC appointment. The court distinguished a previous judgment and dismissed the respondent&#039;s writ petition, allowing the civil appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>