<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 329 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157928</link>
    <description>The court differentiated between two disputed transactions concerning the interpretation of sales under section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act. It held that one sale did not occur during transit, reinstating the addition to the assessable value, while the other sale qualified for exemption as it was deemed to have occurred during transit, supported by document transfer evidence. The judgment emphasized the significance of document transfer and the nature of sales transactions in determining eligibility for exemption under section 6(2) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:29:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=308598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 329 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157928</link>
      <description>The court differentiated between two disputed transactions concerning the interpretation of sales under section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act. It held that one sale did not occur during transit, reinstating the addition to the assessable value, while the other sale qualified for exemption as it was deemed to have occurred during transit, supported by document transfer evidence. The judgment emphasized the significance of document transfer and the nature of sales transactions in determining eligibility for exemption under section 6(2) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>