<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 391 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157922</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the trust, Sai Publication Fund, was not a &#039;dealer&#039; under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, and therefore not liable for sales tax on its publications. The court emphasized that the trust&#039;s primary activity of spreading Saibaba&#039;s message was not considered business, and the incidental sale of literature to support this objective did not amount to business either. Consequently, no tax was imposed on the proceeds from these sales.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 13:48:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=308592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 391 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157922</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the trust, Sai Publication Fund, was not a &#039;dealer&#039; under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, and therefore not liable for sales tax on its publications. The court emphasized that the trust&#039;s primary activity of spreading Saibaba&#039;s message was not considered business, and the incidental sale of literature to support this objective did not amount to business either. Consequently, no tax was imposed on the proceeds from these sales.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>