<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 375 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157920</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the original exemptions granted to the assessees, rejected the reassessment and penalties imposed by the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, and dismissed the enhancement petitions filed by the Revenue. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the lack of valid evidence from the Revenue and the positive documentary evidence provided by the assessees. The revisions filed by the State were dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 13:38:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=308590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 375 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157920</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the original exemptions granted to the assessees, rejected the reassessment and penalties imposed by the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, and dismissed the enhancement petitions filed by the Revenue. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the lack of valid evidence from the Revenue and the positive documentary evidence provided by the assessees. The revisions filed by the State were dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>