<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 386 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157913</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the amended definition of &quot;business&quot; under section 2(5A) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act applies to all sales post-July 1, 1981, regardless of the business closure date. The decision clarified that tax liability is determined by the date of the sales transaction, not the closure of the business. The reference was answered negatively, resolving the dispute on the taxability of post-closure sales under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 13:15:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=308583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 386 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157913</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the amended definition of &quot;business&quot; under section 2(5A) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act applies to all sales post-July 1, 1981, regardless of the business closure date. The decision clarified that tax liability is determined by the date of the sales transaction, not the closure of the business. The reference was answered negatively, resolving the dispute on the taxability of post-closure sales under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=157913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>