<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>RBI Report on Uniform Routing Code and Account Number Structure</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=4538</link>
    <description>The Committee recommends retaining the IFSC branch identifier because many banks rely on it for validation, reconciliation and failed-transaction handling; IFSC should continue for routing (and any new payment system should use IFSC). It advocates a uniform account numbering standard using IBAN and, after evaluating options, recommends the Longest IBAN (26 characters: country code, check digits, 4-character bank id using existing IFSC bank code, and an 18-digit BBAN allowing existing account numbers to be retained). IBAN and existing numbers should co-exist for about three years while banks implement technical and operational changes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:55:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 15:56:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=307269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>RBI Report on Uniform Routing Code and Account Number Structure</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=4538</link>
      <description>The Committee recommends retaining the IFSC branch identifier because many banks rely on it for validation, reconciliation and failed-transaction handling; IFSC should continue for routing (and any new payment system should use IFSC). It advocates a uniform account numbering standard using IBAN and, after evaluating options, recommends the Longest IBAN (26 characters: country code, check digits, 4-character bank id using existing IFSC bank code, and an 18-digit BBAN allowing existing account numbers to be retained). IBAN and existing numbers should co-exist for about three years while banks implement technical and operational changes.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:55:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=4538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>