<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Minutes of the 45th meeting of the SEZ Board of Approval held on 25th March 2011 to consider proposals for setting up of Special Economic Zones</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=3953</link>
    <description>The Board recorded approvals, deferrals and conditional decisions on SEZ proposals, co-developer requests, authorised operations, area and sector changes, denotifications, and extensions of approvals. Approvals were granted where state recommendations and land possession were in order; many items were deferred pending State Government recommendations or post election consideration. Co-developer approvals carried a uniform tax treatment condition permitting Assessing Officer review; lease agreements were to be examined where transactions risked constituting prohibited land sale. Authorised operations, import permissions and unit activities were approved or rejected with conditions, monitoring obligations and several decisions declared non precedential.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:26:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:26:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=306689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Minutes of the 45th meeting of the SEZ Board of Approval held on 25th March 2011 to consider proposals for setting up of Special Economic Zones</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=3953</link>
      <description>The Board recorded approvals, deferrals and conditional decisions on SEZ proposals, co-developer requests, authorised operations, area and sector changes, denotifications, and extensions of approvals. Approvals were granted where state recommendations and land possession were in order; many items were deferred pending State Government recommendations or post election consideration. Co-developer approvals carried a uniform tax treatment condition permitting Assessing Officer review; lease agreements were to be examined where transactions risked constituting prohibited land sale. Authorised operations, import permissions and unit activities were approved or rejected with conditions, monitoring obligations and several decisions declared non precedential.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:26:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=3953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>