<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Minutes of the 46th meeting of the SEZ Board of Approval held on 31st May 2011 to consider proposals for setting up of Special Economic Zones</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=3952</link>
    <description>The Board granted, deferred or rejected multiple SEZ proposals, approving certain formal approvals and authorized operations while deferring others pending DC comments or technical scrutiny. Co developer approvals were conditioned by concerns about tax treatment and potential NFE circumvention, prompting constitution of a committee with CBDT and CBEC to devise ring fencing arrangements. De notifications and withdrawals were approved subject to DC certification of refund of tax/duty benefits. Extensions of approvals and LoPs were routinely granted or refused based on implementation progress, and operational permissions were issued with strict conditions on DTA transactions, export obligations and re export of repaired goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:11:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:11:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=306688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Minutes of the 46th meeting of the SEZ Board of Approval held on 31st May 2011 to consider proposals for setting up of Special Economic Zones</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=3952</link>
      <description>The Board granted, deferred or rejected multiple SEZ proposals, approving certain formal approvals and authorized operations while deferring others pending DC comments or technical scrutiny. Co developer approvals were conditioned by concerns about tax treatment and potential NFE circumvention, prompting constitution of a committee with CBDT and CBEC to devise ring fencing arrangements. De notifications and withdrawals were approved subject to DC certification of refund of tax/duty benefits. Extensions of approvals and LoPs were routinely granted or refused based on implementation progress, and operational permissions were issued with strict conditions on DTA transactions, export obligations and re export of repaired goods.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:11:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=3952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>