https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=3950 The Board recorded multiple formal approvals for SEZs and FTWZs where developers held land and state recommendations existed, while deferring or rejecting proposals lacking timely state concurrence, contiguity, or requisite permissions. Co-developer approvals were conditioned so lease terms do not determine tax treatment and assessing officers retain rights to examine taxability. Extensions of formal and in principle approvals and LoPs were granted, deferred or rejected based on implementation, pending litigation, or state recommendations. De-notifications and area changes were approved subject to contiguity and DC certification of refund of tax/duty benefits. en-us Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:05:31 +0530 Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:05:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=3950 The Board recorded multiple formal approvals for SEZs and FTWZs where developers held land and state recommendations existed, while deferring or rejecting proposals lacking timely state concurrence, contiguity, or requisite permissions. Co-developer approvals were conditioned so lease terms do not determine tax treatment and assessing officers retain rights to examine taxability. Extensions of formal and in principle approvals and LoPs were granted, deferred or rejected based on implementation, pending litigation, or state recommendations. De-notifications and area changes were approved subject to contiguity and DC certification of refund of tax/duty benefits. News - Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:05:31 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=3950