<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Minutes of the 51stmeeting of the SEZ Board of Approval held on 13th March 2012 to consider proposals for setting up Special Economic Zones and other miscellaneous proposals</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=3947</link>
    <description>The SEZ Board recorded approvals, deferrals and conditions across proposals for formal SEZ approvals, co-developer recognitions, authorized operations, area adjustments, validity and LoP extensions, de-notifications and imports of restricted items. Approvals were granted where land possession and state recommendations existed; co-developer status and authorized activities were approved subject to compliance with co-developer agreements, documentation, DC certification and regulatory clearances. The Board emphasised that lease/co-developer agreement terms do not determine tax treatment and that the Assessing Officer may examine taxability under applicable law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:51:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:51:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=306683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Minutes of the 51stmeeting of the SEZ Board of Approval held on 13th March 2012 to consider proposals for setting up Special Economic Zones and other miscellaneous proposals</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=3947</link>
      <description>The SEZ Board recorded approvals, deferrals and conditions across proposals for formal SEZ approvals, co-developer recognitions, authorized operations, area adjustments, validity and LoP extensions, de-notifications and imports of restricted items. Approvals were granted where land possession and state recommendations existed; co-developer status and authorized activities were approved subject to compliance with co-developer agreements, documentation, DC certification and regulatory clearances. The Board emphasised that lease/co-developer agreement terms do not determine tax treatment and that the Assessing Officer may examine taxability under applicable law.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:51:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=3947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>