<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court has taken a serious view in cases of delay in filing appeals in the High Courts as also SLPs.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=3808</link>
    <description>The directive requires strict adherence to appeal filing timelines and mandates that SLP proposals be submitted complete to the directorate within 21 days of the High Court judgment, with date-wise, officer-specific explanations for any delay; workload or leave are not acceptable excuses and responsibility for delay may attract administrative action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:29:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=306544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court has taken a serious view in cases of delay in filing appeals in the High Courts as also SLPs.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=3808</link>
      <description>The directive requires strict adherence to appeal filing timelines and mandates that SLP proposals be submitted complete to the directorate within 21 days of the High Court judgment, with date-wise, officer-specific explanations for any delay; workload or leave are not acceptable excuses and responsibility for delay may attract administrative action.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:29:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=3808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>