<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Circular No.158/9/2012-ST dated 8th May 2012 stayed by Chief Justice of Delhi High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=3554</link>
    <description>A departmental circular demanded a differential service tax from eight categories of professionals who paid tax on receipt basis despite the Point of Taxation Rules, 2011. The Delhi High Court granted an interim stay on coercive recovery of the challenged differential demand for services and invoices issued before the relevant cutoff, preventing immediate enforcement against the affected professionals while the legal challenge is pending.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 11:03:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 11:03:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=306291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Circular No.158/9/2012-ST dated 8th May 2012 stayed by Chief Justice of Delhi High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=3554</link>
      <description>A departmental circular demanded a differential service tax from eight categories of professionals who paid tax on receipt basis despite the Point of Taxation Rules, 2011. The Delhi High Court granted an interim stay on coercive recovery of the challenged differential demand for services and invoices issued before the relevant cutoff, preventing immediate enforcement against the affected professionals while the legal challenge is pending.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 11:03:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=3554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>