<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Taxation of Banks</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=1198</link>
    <description>India rejected a uniform banking-sector tax, citing strong regulation of its banks, absence of taxpayer-funded bailouts during the recent crisis, and existing measures such as the statutory liquidity ratio and cash reserve ratio; it favoured financial-sector reforms to enhance growth and stability while the G20 endorsed the principle that taxpayers should not pay for rescues and left the choice of mechanism to individual countries.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:55:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:55:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=303956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Taxation of Banks</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=1198</link>
      <description>India rejected a uniform banking-sector tax, citing strong regulation of its banks, absence of taxpayer-funded bailouts during the recent crisis, and existing measures such as the statutory liquidity ratio and cash reserve ratio; it favoured financial-sector reforms to enhance growth and stability while the G20 endorsed the principle that taxpayers should not pay for rescues and left the choice of mechanism to individual countries.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:55:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=1198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>